When AI evaluation relies on external LLMs, every evaluated trace generates a billable API call to your LLM provider. That's your Evaluation Trust Tax, the cost your LLM provider charges for every API call your monitoring tool sends out for evaluation. It scales with every trace, every evaluation metric, and every token you evaluate, and at scale it adds up to a meaningful portion of your evaluation TCO.
Fiddler Centor Models (formerly Fiddler Trust Models) are purpose-built AI evaluation models that run directly in your own infrastructure, evaluating every trace locally in under 100ms with no external API calls.
Use this calculator to compare both approaches and see how Fiddler Centor Models eliminate the per-call API cost, driving down your total evaluation TCO.
This calculator estimates and compares the annual cost of evaluating AI agent traces using external LLMs versus Centor Models running on GPU infrastructure. The Evaluations Trust Tax is the difference: what you pay for external LLM evaluation that Centor Models eliminate. Observability platform fees are excluded on both sides. All costs use publicly listed pricing and the inputs you configure.
Each trace sent to an external LLM for evaluation generates a billable API call. Costs scale directly with trace volume, token count, number of evaluations per trace, and the model selected.
Formula:
Assumptions:
Sourced from each provider's public list pricing as of 05/2026.
Centor Models run on dedicated GPU infrastructure, with no external API calls per evaluation. Costs reflect the number of GPUs required to handle your full trace volume at 100% coverage. At lower volumes, idle GPU capacity means infrastructure cost dominates. As volume grows and utilization increases, Centor Models become increasingly cost-effective compared to per-call LLM pricing.
Formula:
Assumptions:
When sampling rate is below 100%, a portion of traces go unevaluated by the external LLM. Any AI incidents that occur on those unevaluated traces go undetected. This estimates the financial exposure from those missed incidents. Centor Models evaluate 100% of traces, so missed incident cost is always zero.
Formula:
Assumptions:
The evaluation Cost is the annual cost difference between the least expensive selected LLM and Centor Models. TCO adds incident risk exposure on top of that, representing the full financial advantage of switching to Centor Models at your configured scale.
Formula:
Volume Discounts